The Egiazaryan case is an interesting example of the complex network of different national laws that can apply to international commercial arbitration issues. It also shows how important it is to examine the laws of the places where arbitration agreements are incorporated and how these laws can affect the obligations of the parties. In addition, it may be advisable to re-evaluate active agreements to determine where liability may lie. However, we are also concerned that with each subsidiary, we need separate framework contracts for each supplier in order to maintain separation/distinction for corporate sails, best business practices and other purposes. Have you ever identified this problem and, if so, how did you approach it? Given the premises and reciprocal agreements, the parties agree: 2. As of the effective date of this Agreement, the company assumes responsibility for all contracts, positions of trust, creations, debts, debts, debts, debts and obligations of one of the subsidiaries subject to the merger, and all will join the company – on the date of entry into force and after the company comes into force – and will be enforceable against it and its characteristics to the same extent if they are contracted or bound by a contract. Agreement to merge subsidiaries into a parent company. „One of the most controversial issues in international commercial arbitration is the effect of the arbitration agreement on non-signatories. Arbitration is a consensual process and, in all cases, the outcome depends on a combination of (a) the applicable law; (b) the legal principle used by this law to respond (including agency, alter ego, Estoppel, third-party beneficiary); and (c) the facts on a case-by-case basis. In accordance with Article 105 of the Russian Civil Code (), a parent company and its subsidiaries are jointly responsible for the contracts it has entered into. The Court of Arbitration in London found that this involved responsibility for the implementation of the arbitration agreement. On the basis of the long-standing principle that English law governs who is a party to an arbitration agreement and that the arbitrators concluded that the law of the agreement was English law, the court found that section 105 had no effect. In this case, Burton J expressly stated that the „applicable law“ is not necessarily the right of the agreement. Instead, he indicated that English law would apply to a party`s right of residence with respect to a parent`s liability for the obligations of its subsidiary.
He also pointed out that, in the context of the conclusion of a transaction, all matters relating to the incorporation of a company are governed by the law of the place of foundation. 3. As of the effective date of this agreement, all leases under which the Company operates one of the characteristics of the merging subsidiaries are deemed terminated and terminated under this agreement.