Mar Mikhael Agreement

„The Mar Mikhael agreement was not only a meeting between political leaders, but it has proved in recent years that it represents a possibility of convergence and a bridge of knowledge and trust between the bases of Hezbollah and the Free Patriotic Movement,“ he said, adding that the agreement was of paramount importance. „We agree on foreign policy issues and will remain a guarantee for Hezbollah in Lebanon if that country is the subject of aggression by Israel or terrorist groups. But unfortunately, in internal cases, we face decisions that do not contribute to the construction of the state in Lebanon,“ bassil said. Hezbollah finally took advantage of the agreement by reaping the benefits it wanted, even though it did not respect its own part of the agreement. As a result, the head of the FPM, Gebran Bassil, said a few months ago that his party did not agree with Hezbollah on an important point of the fourth clause of the agreement: the promise of state building. Last Sunday`s speeches in Jahiliyeh at a commemoration of the 40th day since the death of Wi`am Wahhab`s former bodyguard, Mohammad Abu Diab, are also a sign of an imminent white revolution against the Taif agreement. Some parties want to amend the agreement to address what they see as a power imbalance leading to the political marginalization of the Shiite community. In other words, the Shiite community wants to change the status quo by adapting the current balance to increase its power and influence in the decision-making process. The pioneering agreement was signed by Hizbullah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah and FPM founder President Michel Aoun at a ceremony held on 5 February 2006 at Mar Mikhael Church in the southern suburb of Beyre, Shiyyah. B- Closing the borders between Lebanon and Syria, while eliminating tensions that could lead to collapse in the process, since Lebanon and Syria have long had to conclude this process as part of an agreement between the two countries. This time, the shock in the Christian camp was caused by the Boorian and militia behavior of Berri`s supporters, especially when they invaded Christian neighborhoods. The Christian side suddenly became aware of the surprising level of political arrogance of the Shiite camp at the local level. The Christian camp likes to believe that the agreement between Hezbollah and the FPM is no longer relevant, especially given the arrival of Saad Hariri at the scene of the crime and the supremacy of Iranian influence in Lebanon.

On the occasion of the 12th anniversary of the agreement between President Michel Aoun and Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah in the Mar Mikhael Church, Hezbollah stressed the importance of this historic event that has opened a new path on the Lebanese scene, whose effectiveness is made during the stages traversed by Lebanon from the war of July 2006 to the war on terrorism , has proven itself. The Shiite side reaffirmed its commitment to the agreement and stressed that it would remain in place until the main objectives were achieved and Lebanon began to move towards a better future. „The Mar Mikhael agreement ensured political stability and laid the foundations for a new relationship of trust between the components of Lebanese society,“ Abu Zeid wrote on Twitter.